Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 11:44

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Billy Joel attempted suicide twice and fell into coma after affair with friend's wife - KOMO
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What can I say to a scammer who thinks he loves me, but I don't want to be scammed?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Cat Parasite Can Seriously Disrupt Brain Function, Study Suggests - ScienceAlert
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Marchand, Bennett, Ekblad want to remain with Panthers, aim for Stanley Cup 3-peat - NHL.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Poll: What Review Score Would You Give Mario Kart World? - Nintendo Life
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Logan Gilbert sees velocity dip in rehab start | Mariners injury updates - The Seattle Times